Nissan Ariya vs Volvo XC40: How Do These Electric SUVs Compare?

Electric vehicles are growing in popularity thanks to their eco-friendly credentials and advanced technology features. Two compelling options in the increasingly crowded EV SUV marketplace are the 2023 Nissan Ariya and 2022 Volvo XC40 Recharge. But how do these battery-powered crossovers stack up? This in-depth comparative review highlights the key similarities and differences to help you decide which model best fits your needs and budget.

Overview and History

The Nissan Ariya debuted in concept form back in 2019 before entering production for the 2023 model year. As Nissan‘s first all-electric crossover SUV, the Ariya promises up to 300 miles of driving range thanks to its high-capacity 63 kWh and 87 kWh battery packs. Pricing starts at $43,190 for the entry-level front-wheel drive Ariya, while the range-topping all-wheel drive Evolve+ e-4ORCE model tops out at $54,190.

Volvo introduced the XC40 Recharge as part of its "Recharge" lineup of plug-in hybrid and fully electric vehicles in 2020. Using Volvo‘s compact XC40 platform, the Recharge offers an EPA-estimated 223 miles of range from its 78 kWh battery. With a starting MSRP of $54,895, the XC40 Recharge commands a significant price premium over the Ariya.

Performance and Driving Dynamics

The Ariya edges out the XC40 Recharge in a few key performance metrics. Its standard 214 horsepower/221 lb-ft single electric motor hits 60 mph in 7.0 seconds. Opting for the dual-motor e-4ORCE all-wheel drive model cuts that time to 5.1 seconds thanks to a combined 389 horsepower and 442 lb-ft torque output. The Ariya‘s top speed checks in at 124 mph.

The XC40 Recharge develops 402 combined horsepower and 486 lb-ft torque from its dual electric motors, reaching 60 mph in a brisk 4.7 seconds before topping out at 112 mph. So while the Volvo bests the Ariya to 60 mph, the Nissan has the higher top speed. Both SUVs offer a choice between front- or all-wheel drive powertrains.

Early driving impressions give the nod to the Volvo for responsiveness and handling. The XC40 Recharge feels sportier and more planted through corners compared to Ariya’s more comfort-oriented tuning. Ride quality is slightly firmer in the Volvo but still compliant enough for daily driving. The Ariya offers a smoother, quieter ride that favors long-distance cruising.

Range, Charging and Efficiency

The Ariya clearly wins when it comes to maximum driving range, with up to 304 miles possible from its extended range, dual-motor configuration. That‘s 81 more miles than the top-of-the-line XC40 Recharge model. Around town and in combined city/highway driving, owners can expect 230+ miles from the Ariya depending on configuration and driving style.

However, the XC40 Recharge counters with superior charging capability. Its battery can charge from 10% to 80% capacity in as little as 37 minutes using a 150 kW DC fast charging station. The Ariya isn’t far behind at 40 minutes for a 20-80% charge, but its lack of a 400-volt electrical architecture means peak charging rate tops out at 130 kW. Both SUVs fully recharge from empty in around 8 hours using a 240-volt Level 2 home charger.

When it comes to energy efficiency, the XC40 Recharge is rated at 89 MPGe combined. That falls short of the Ariya’s up to 104 MPGe efficiency, a mark that comes very close to the efficiency of a Toyota Prius hybrid. So while the Volvo may charge faster, the Nissan can travel farther on a full charge.

Exterior and Interior Dimensions

As compact crossover SUVs, neither vehicle offers an especially spacious interior or cargo area. The XC40 Recharge measures 174.2 inches long and stands 65 inches tall, right in line with the Ariya’s 173.0-inch length and 63.2-inch height. At 72.7 inches wide, the Volvo is fractionally broader than the Ariya’s 71.7-inch width. Both EVs ride on a 105.1-inch wheelbase.

Passenger space is nearly identical, with comfortable seating for five adults. Front seat occupants have ample head and legroom in either model thanks to the lack of a front driveshaft and transmission tunnel. Rear seat space is where the Ariya pulls ahead slightly, with improved legroom and a flatter floor.

Cargo room tips in favor of the Ariya as well. With all seats occupied, it offers 22.8 cubic feet of cargo volume. Folding the 60:40 split rear seats down opens up 56.9 cubic feet, providing enough room for bulky items like mountain bikes. By comparison, the XC40 Recharge checks in at 15.4 cubic behind the second row and 45.9 cubic feet maximum.

Safety and Technology

As you’d expect from two modern electric vehicles, cutting-edge safety systems and technology features abound in both the Nissan Ariya and Volvo XC40 Recharge. Standard equipment includes forward collision warning with automatic emergency braking, blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alert and lane keep assist across trim levels. The Volvo also comes equipped with Pilot Assist semi-autonomous driver assistance technology.

Nissan fights back with its ProPilot Assist system and unique e-Pedal mode that allows for one-pedal driving. Simply easing off the accelerator engages regenerative braking and brings the Ariya to a complete stop. Inside, the Ariya’s wide 12.3-inch touchscreen infotainment display with integrated Google services narrowly beats Volvo’s slick Google-powered 12.0-inch touchscreen. Both systems feature natural voice controls, smartphone integration and over-the-air software update capability.

The Verdict

The 2023 Nissan Ariya and 2022 Volvo XC40 Recharge both make compelling cases in the premium electric SUV segment. At its cheaper starting price, higher efficiency ratings and class-leading driving range, the Ariya looks like an exceptional value on paper. But the XC40 Recharge counterpunches with quicker acceleration, sharper handling and faster charging times.

Ultimately, this comparison comes down to preference. The Ariya appeals most to budget-focused shoppers wanting max range and road trip capability from their electric vehicle. Meanwhile, driving enthusiasts may lean toward the XC40 Recharge for its sportier personality and brand cachet. Regardless of which you choose, either model represents a major leap forward for electric SUVs.

Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Logo
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled