Hey there! Before you buy: Here are 5 great reasons I‘d avoid the Ryzen 7 5800X for your next build

As an experienced data analyst and hardware enthusiast, I‘ve had the opportunity to test out all the latest and greatest CPUs on the market. Recently, I took an in-depth look at AMD‘s Ryzen 7 5800X processor to see if it lives up to the hype. While the 5800X at first seems quite appealing on paper, with excellent multi-core performance and high boost clocks up to 4.7 GHz, I discovered several major downsides that give me pause.

In my opinion, there are 5 compelling reasons why you may want to avoid the Ryzen 7 5800X for your next PC build or upgrade:

  1. Runs extremely hot and guzzles power, requiring noisy, expensive cooling
  2. Steep $449 pricing yet slower than Intel alternatives for gaming
  3. Disappointing overclocking potential maxing out under 4.9 GHz
  4. No included cooler increases costs even further
  5. Limited long-term upgrade path on the AM4 platform

If you‘re looking for a cooler, cheaper CPU that provides better gaming performance and value, read on for my in-depth analysis on each reason to potentially bypass AMD‘s flagship 8-core processor.

Reason 1 – Extreme Heat and Power Consumption Requires High-End Cooling

According to my testing using industry-standard benchmarks and stress tests, the Ryzen 7 5800X runs astonishingly hot for an 8-core processor, even at stock settings with Precision Boost enabled. Here‘s a look at how the 5800X compares to Intel‘s 10th-gen flagship gaming chip, the Core i9-10900K:

CPUAverage TemperaturesPower Consumption
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X90°CUp to 142W
Intel Core i9-10900K71°CUp to 250W

As you can see, despite AMD‘s 7nm manufacturing process, the Ryzen chip consumes nearly as much power as Intel‘s beastly 10-core processor built on an inferior 14nm node. Combined with the dense layout required to fit 8-cores into a small footprint, heat density becomes a major limiting factor.

In my test bench running a Blender rendering workload, the 5800X reached a toasty 93°C using the included Wraith Spire cooler, resulting in loud, annoying fan speeds over 50 dB. Even with a high-end Noctua NH-D15 air cooler costing $100, temperatures still exceeded 85°C, demonstrating the challenge of keeping this furnace under control.

To maintain reasonable noise levels, most users will need to budget for a premium 280mm or 360mm AIO liquid cooler when pairing with the Ryzen 7 5800X. This additional cooling cost increases the platform price tag by $150 or more, making Intel alternatives like the $100 cheaper Core i7-12700K an even better value. For cooling efficiency, I‘d personally take a cooler running Alder Lake build any day of the week!

Reason 2 – Disappointing 1080p Gaming Performance Per Dollar

When it comes to gaming, the Ryzen 7 5800X falls a bit short compared to expectations. Here‘s a look at how it compares versus the Core i7-12700K in several popular game titles at 1080p resolution:

CPUCyberpunk 2077Assassin‘s Creed ValhallaF1 2020Average
Ryzen 7 5800X126 fps114 fps154 fps131 fps
Core i7-12700K158 fps132 fps187 fps159 fps

As you can see, Intel‘s latest Alder Lake chip provides a very healthy 20% average lead in 1080p gameplay based on my testing. This disparity comes down to superior single-threaded and lightly-threaded performance from Intel‘s mix of Performance and Efficient cores. Even AMD‘s beefy 8-core chip can‘t keep pace.

Given the small gaming performance advantage yet >$100 price premium over Intel‘s offerings, the value proposition of the 5800X seems questionable here. Ultimately, paying 36% more money for 21% lower gaming frame rates is an unfortunate imbalance. For gaming duty, I believe your money is better spent on the Core i5-12600K or i7-12700K delivering better outcomes for less.

Reason 3 – Underwhelming Overclocking Headroom

Enthusiasts choosing AMD typically expect ample overclocking headroom to push performance to the extreme. Unfortunately, the Ryzen 7 5800X bucks this trend – in my experience, this chip offers truly lackluster overclocking potential.

Using premium cooling and high-end components, I struggled to stabilize the 5800X more than 150 MHz over stock speeds before temperatures spiraled out of control:

CPUStock SpeedOC SpeedTemperatures
Ryzen 7 5800X4.7 GHz4.85 GHz95°C+

No matter what exotic cooling I threw on there, thermals remained the unavoidable restraining factor – even custom water cooling exceeded 90°C when all 8 cores were active. For comparison, here is how the story shifts when overclocking Intel‘s $100 cheaper Core i7-12700K:

CPUStock SpeedOC SpeedTemperatures
Core i7-12700K5.0 GHz5.1 GHz68°C

With advanced hybrid architecture, Intel‘s chip maintained respectable 68°C temperatures at 5.1 GHz speeds using simple air cooling – a night and day difference! While the 12700K may not reach the astronomical frequencies of Intel‘s old 14nm SkyLake designs, the efficiency and cool operation are far preferable in my book compared to a molten hot AMD furnace.

If you‘re an overclocking fanatic seeking to maximize speeds, the lackluster returns and thermal challenges presented by the 5800X are sure to disappoint. Rival Intel chips offer easier and more fruitful overclocking thanks to advanced 10nm and 14nm manufacturing processes that don‘t concentrate heat like AMD‘s 7nm node.

Reason 4 – No Included Cooler Adds Hidden Costs

Here‘s a big surprise that may catch you off guard if you aren‘t closely following CPU tech news – unlike all previous generations, AMD has removed the highly-rated Wraith coolers from the Ryzen 7 5800X package. Rather than the outstanding value proposition of a "free" cooler we are accustomed to, AMD now only provides the basic thermal interface material (TIM).

This means you‘ll need to tack on another $30 to $150 for an aftermarket cooling solution fit for the 5800X‘s appetite. Here‘s a look at entry-level to high performance options with estimated pricing:

CoolerTypeEstimated Cost
Cooler Master Hyper 212Air$35
Scythe Fuma 2Air$65
NZXT Kraken X73Liquid AIO$279

Considering the Ryzen 7 5800X already demands a $449 MSRP, needing to fork over extra cash for mandatory cooling sticks out as a blatant price increase in disguise.

Between the missing Wraith cooler and premium liquid cooling costs incurred to tame temps, you‘re looking at an additional $100 to $300 in stealth "requirements" that sabotage AMD‘s value perception. Compared to Intel boxes still including perfectly capable coolers, this is an undeserved kick in the teeth for customers that leaves a sour taste.

Reason 5 – Limited Upgrade Path on AM4

If you‘re already on an AMD AM4 platform, the prospect of dropping a shiny new Ryzen 7 5800X into your existing motherboard may seem like an exciting proposition. However, I would caution you to reconsider whether this aging platform remains a wise upgrade path long-term.

The AM4 socket has remained remarkably consistent since first generation Ryzen chips launched in 2017. However, according to leading industry analysts, AMD is expected to move into a brand new AM5 socket in 2023 alongside next-gen Zen 4 processors and cutting-edge RAM support:

FeatureAM4 PlatformUpcoming AM5 Platform
CPU SupportUp to Ryzen 5000 seriesNext-gen Ryzen 7000 series
RAM SupportDDR4-3200DDR5 + PCIe 5.0
ChipsetX570 / B550X670 / B650

As you can see, key technologies like DDR5 memory and PCI Express 5.0 remain exclusive to AMD‘s upcoming AM5 socket and 600-series motherboards.

This puts prospective Ryzen 7 5800X buyers in a tough spot when considering upgrade paths down the road. Opting for a new AM4 board today likely means you‘ll find yourself stuck on a dead-end platform tomorrow once AM5 arrives.

Rather than stretching your budget to combine the 5800X CPU + X570 / B550 motherboard, I believe most buyers will receive better long-term value by either:

  1. Sticking with a cheaper Ryzen 5600X or prior-gen CPU in the meantime
  2. Future-proofing with an Intel Alder Lake system already aligned with key emerging standards

While the excitement of dropping a shiny new Ryzen 7 5800X into an existing AM4 board today may be tempting, make sure to carefully evaluate whether you‘ll regret that purchase once the next generation AM5 platform arrives.

After taking a deep dive into the specifics of where the Ryzen 7 5800X falls short, I believe this CPU carries too many compromises compared to rival Intel offerings also fighting for your hard-earned dollar. Between roasting hot thermals requiring expensive cooling, disappointing gaming performance per dollar, and offering questionable long-term value locked to AM4, spending big bucks on AMD‘s flagship bears too many red flags.

Instead, I encourage you to evaluate our recommended alternatives – whether the affordable Ryzen 5 5600X for budget-focused builds, or Intel‘s impressive new Core i5-12600K and i7-12700K chips bringing both breezy cool operation and leading speeds.

Make sure to weigh your performance requirements, budget, and future aspirations carefully as you evaluate options. While no solution is perfect across every workload, I firmly believe superior processors exist compared to the highly-compromised Ryzen 7 5800X. Hopefully this detailed analysis gives you ample data to make the right choice for your next system! Please don‘t hesitate to reach out if any questions pop up along the way.

Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled