Deciding Between Spotify vs YouTube Music? Read this Comprehensive Feature Breakdown First

So you’re trying to decide between streaming music with YouTube Music or dominant leader Spotify. Both options give you endless on-demand access to tunes, but they take markedly different approaches. From audio fidelity to music discovery to pricing—how exactly do these two streaming experiences compare?

As a passionate music fan who has used both Spotify and YouTube Music extensively over the past three years, I’ll carefully compare their key strengths and weaknesses across 10 major categories. My goal is to provide detailed insights that’ll help you determine which music service fits your listening lifestyle best. Let’s dive in!

Audio Quality

First up, audio quality. After all, these apps can offer all the songs under the sun but it means nothing if they sound bad, right?

Supported Bitrates:

Spotify: Up to 320 kbps (kilobits/second)
YouTube Music: Up to 256 kbps

So at a technical level, Spotify streams at a higher maximum bitrate meaning its audio encodes in richer detail compared to YouTube Music.

However, when actually listening to the same songs on both services, I never noticed huge fidelity gaps even when playing back on high-end headphones. Why? Because both stream most non-download content around 128kbps for bandwidth efficiency.

YouTube uses the Ogg Vorbis codec for audio which matches Spotify quality at ~128 kbps while minimizing file size. So for casual listening, audio won‘t make choosing between the two especially hard.

Another less examined quality metric though involves loudness consistency. Thanks to built-in volume leveling across tracks, YouTube Music maintained noticeably steadier overall volume levels in my testing. With Spotify, older Bob Dylan songs drowned under louder modern pop productions in radio playlists—an immersion breaking experience.

So while Spotify certainly supports better absolute audio quality thanks to their higher bitrate ceiling, for most real-world use, Youtube Music leveled the playing audio field through other technical efforts.

The Verdict: Essentially identical streaming bitrate performance but YouTube Music handles loudness better in my experience.

| Audio Quality Comparison | Spotify | YouTube Music | 
| -----------              | ----------- |
| Max Bitrate       | 320 kbps | 256 kbps
| Typical Bitrate*   | 128 kbps       | 128 kbps |
Audio Codec           | Ogg Vorbis | Ogg Vorbis
Loudness Consistency | Poor due to wider variety of audio sources | Excellent automated volume normalization

* Non-downloaded streams

User Experience and Interface

Let‘s move up from the engineering basement to what your ears and eyes actually see using these services every day. How do the Spotify and YouTube Music interfaces and overall user experience compare for playing music?

Since Spotify dedicates itself entirely to music streaming, the interface feels more purpose-built around just that task. The tabbed menu makes jumping between Search, Library, Home screen recs, Podcasts etc super intuitive. No risk of getting distracted watching puppy videos—this is pure audio territory.

Comparatively, the YouTube Music interface tries condensing both a vast music catalog AND the entirety of YouTube video under one roof. Moving between the audio-only "Music" tab and the video-centric "Explore" tab introduces some navigational friction compared to Spotify.

Browsing new releases also tends to showcase a visually busier feed of new album art vs Spotify‘s radio-tuned picks. Individual artist pages pack richer media but generally come at the cost of added UI complexity.

The verdict: Spotify offers the cleaner and likely more beginner-friendly interface while YouTube Music struggles slightly reconciling music AND videos under one roof.

Music Discovery and Recommendations

Now what everyone using a music streaming service presumably cares about most—finding new tunes perfectly tailored to your tastes. Who does it better between Spotify and YouTube Music?

Here Spotify leverage over a decade of refining a best-in-class recommendation algorithm that remains the gold standard against which all other contenders get judged. Their mood and genre-based Daily Mix playlists offer fantastic day-to-day listening variety while requiring no work on the user‘s end.

But Spotify‘s crown jewel sits with the automated weekly Discover Weekly playlist refreshed every Monday morning. Like an old friend saying "Hey, based on the new artists you‘ve been digging lately, check out this hour‘s worth of never-before-heard tracks I think you‘ll love." Over 70% of Spotify listeners regularly stream their Discover Weekly because the suggestions so consistently surprise and delight.

Now YouTube Music nor YouTube overall slouch on understanding user tastes given over a billion viewers worldwide. But comparatively, YouTube Music‘s core music suggestions feel less mature—unsurprising given music sits peripheral to their core video product.

However…YouTube Music‘s direct integration with YouTube unlocks serendipitous discovery possibilities unmatched elsewhere. Want to dive deep on an obscure subgenre or explore every concert taped of your favorite 90s band? Start playing related YouTube Music videos and behold the algorithm working its magic suggesting gold after gold.

The verdict: Spotify remains the undisputed recommendation leader through their Refined and reliably delightful Discover Weekly playlist while YouTube Music‘s video-infused music DNA keeps things wonderfully weird and unpredictable.

Podcasts and Other Content

Many music streamers enjoy podcasts as much as pop songs these days. So how do Spotify and YouTube music compare on spoken audio content?

In a word–lopsidedly.

Spotify aggressively invested in becoming a go-to podcast destination by signing exclusive streaming distribution deals with podcasting elite like Joe Rogan and Alex Cooper while enabling smaller shows to monetize through their network.

By contrast, YouTube Music supports podcasts but hardly spotlights them. Odds are folks already have their chosen podcast apps or simply access talk shows through the main YouTube site.

Flip the script on other non-musical content however. Thanks to deep ties with the broader YouTube ecosystem, YouTube Music enables effortless watching of cooking tutorials, late night talk shows clips or Ivy League lectures on medieval history. Truly the everything store of online video.

Comparatively Spotify focuses music and podcasts alone meaning no distractions. But also no variety beyond that. Want audio books or meditation tracks or YouTube videos? Additional apps will be required.

The verdict: Spotify for podcast junkies, YouTube Music for peppering music with niche video content galore.

Social and Community Features

Music at its best forges human connections. Do Spotify and YouTube Music successfully foster music lover communities?

Spotify actively enables sharing listening activity with friends in real time thanks to their taste-focused social features. Collaborative playlists let groups assemble songs together while comment functionality across artist pages and content builds bonds around music. Given so many artists maintain public listening profiles, Spotify manages surprising intimacy between fans and creators.

YouTube Music lacks such native social capabilities however. Commenting and sharing center around YouTube proper rather than localized community on YouTube Music itself. However Spotify can‘t compete with the raw visibility power of a video going viral on YouTube and getting shared publically millions of times thanks to external social media.

The verdict: Spotify better facilitates direct music fan-to-fan and fan-to-artist social interaction inline while YouTube Music relies on external platforms like Twitter and Facebook to drive sharing.

Music Catalog Size

No matter how snazzy the interface or dialed the recommendations, a streaming music app wins or loses on its catalog size. How do our two contenders compare based on pure catalog offerings?

Impressively, Spotify maintains over 70 million tracks and 4 million podcasts globally thanks to licensing agreements with major and minor labels alike. Chances are strong Spotify can satisfy music itches across any contemporary genre.

YouTube Music official counts around 60 million songs—seemingly smaller based on that tally alone. But simply quantifying YouTube‘s catalog proves deceptively complex. Thanks to cover songs, remixes, unearthed concert footage and long tail memeified tracks, tallying total assets gets fuzzy fast. Suffice to say that between official label relationships and YouTube‘s legacy user generated media ecosystem, obscurities often surface on YouTube Music that no algorithm can possibly surface elsewhere.

The verdict: Bigger by the numbers, Spotify certainly offers most conventional popular music imaginable. But YouTube Music‘s perpetual influx of new unofficial recordings keeps their shelves arguably fresher.

Downloading for Offline Playback

We‘ve all been there. You‘re pumped for tunes on this flight but realize to your horror at cruising altitude that your data signal remains firmly on the ground. Does offline listening look similar between Spotify and YouTube Music?

Spotify makes downloading your music library for offline usage dead simple. See that "Download" button visible across podcasts episodes, albums, artists and playlists? One tap saves all that music locally so you can rock out Internet-free. Sync up to 10,000 songs on up to 5 different devices and seamlessly pick up playback next chance you catch WiFi.

YouTube Music takes a slightly different approach by automating the offline curation process into personalized Offline Mixtapes. Toggle the Offline slider and algorithms assemble recommended playlists based on your listening data. Certainly useful but lacks the precise manual control Spotify enables. Still YouTube Music downloads make flights and road trips sans streaming more tolerable.

The verdict: Spotify Downloads give more user control while YouTube Music automates offline listening into an eclectic mixtape. Choose your own adventure!

Cost and Pricing

Last but never least—cost. How do Spotify and YouTube Music streaming prices compare?


  • Premium Individual: $9.99/month
  • Duo Plan: $12.99/month
  • Family Plan (6 accounts): $15.99/month
  • Students: $4.99/month

YouTube Music

  • Individual: $9.99/month
  • Family Plan (5 accounts) – $14.99/month
  • Students: $4.99/month

YouTube Music also lets you bundle Music Premium with main YouTube Premium Video for $2 more total per month (saving $2 vs separate purchases).

Otherwise the two services land remarkably close on pricing with Spotify allowing 1 extra family member. Both offer generous initial free trial periods for the premium tiers. Overall strong value in both options.

The verdict: Nearly identical pricing but YouTube Music availability as part of a bundle adds incremental value.

Concluding Thoughts

We‘ve just reviewed 10 core areas showing how Spotify and YouTube Music approach delivering polished music streaming experiences. To me, Spotify remains better optimized for simply enjoying music day-to-day thanks Especially to their dialed recommendation algorithms and podcast investments.

That said, don‘t underestimate just how powerful leaning into YouTube Music can be for diehard music lovers. Between rare concert footage, discontinued singles and odd remixes, YouTube Music inherits endless content tied together by fans and video sharing.

Hopefully breaking down these key item-by-item comparisons gives you a clearer sense of each app‘s strengths to make deciding between Spotify vs YouTube Music easier. Both stand as revolutionary pillars advancing the future of music enjoyment globally. But ask yourself honestly—am I fundamentally seeking a music player218265 or a timeless video jukebox tapping into pop culture itself?

Let the tunes play on!

Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled