Ryzen 5 3500X vs Ryzen 5 3600: A Comprehensive Comparison

Hey there! If you‘re looking to build a new mid-range AMD gaming rig or workstation, no doubt the Ryzen 5 lineup has caught your eye. AMD positions Ryzen 5 processors as the sweet spot for performance and affordability. And two of the most intriguing options are the 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5 3600 versus the similarly priced 6-core, 6-thread Ryzen 5 3500X.

On the surface, these two CPUs share quite a bit – both leverage AMD‘s advanced 7nm Zen 2 architecture while slotting neatly into the 65 watt power envelope. But by digging into the benchmarks, we see that the 3600‘s support for simultaneous multi-threading gives it a definitive performance advantage across gaming and productivity workloads – at an extremely compelling value.

In this direct head-to-head breakdown, we will compare all the key specs, analyze real-world testing, evaluate gaming FPS scores, weigh pricing and availability, and ultimately provide a clear recommendation on which CPU delivers better overall value. Time to find out!

Understanding the Ryzen 5 Series Market Positioning

First, some quick context on AMD‘s Ryzen 5000 desktop processors. Ryzen 5000 chips make up AMD‘s highest performance mainstream desktop PC gaming and content creation lineup. Based on both a refined 7nm process and the latest cutting-edge Zen 3 architecture, Ryzen 5000 series (led by flagship parts like the 8-core 5800X3D) readily rivals and even beats Intel‘s 12th Gen Core-i processors in many gaming and productivity benchmarks.

However, Ryzen 5000 models are generally priced at a premium over predecessor Ryzen 3000 CPUs. That brings us back to the Ryzen 5 3600 versus 3500X. Both leverage the previous generation Zen 2 design on 7nm instead of Zen 3. But they deliver excellent 1080p gaming performance and solid multimedia chops at an affordable mid-range price point.

We‘ll analyze below, but AMD‘s choice to leave SMT enabled on the Ryzen 5 3600 while disabling it on the 3500X results in the 3600 pulling notably ahead for both workstation and gaming tasks…at an equally attractive price. Ultimately giving the 3600 excellent value that the 3500X has trouble matching.

Okay, let‘s kick off this showdown with a look under the hood!

Head to Head Specs Comparison

Despite being introduced simultaneously mid-2019, the Ryzen 5 3600 and 3500X do vary across a couple key architectural aspects:

SpecificationRyzen 5 3500XRyzen 5 3600
Cores/Threads6/66/12 (SMT enabled)
Lithography7nm FinFET
Base Clock3.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost ClockUp to 4.1 GHzUp to 4.2 GHz
Cache Total32MB L332MB L3
TDP65 watts
PlatformAM4 socket

Given the matching 6-core layout backed with healthy L3 cache, you might expect reasonably equivalent performance. However, by enabling multi-threading on the 3600 (via simultaneous multi-threading technology or SMT) while excluding it from the 3500X, AMD created a notable divergence in capabilities. Let‘s explore why…

Why SMT Matters

High performance processors like these Ryzen 5000 chips gain a healthy single-threaded speed boost by leveraging superscalar execution with out-of-order processing. This allows work to be simultaneously scheduled across the CPU‘s execution units even for traditional single-threaded programs.

But significant untapped throughput potential still exists. Simultaneous multi-threading seeks to capitalize by essentially doubling available logical cores. The operating system perceives an SMT-enabled chip like the Ryzen 5 3600 as having 12 logical cores instead of its 6 physical cores. This allows more instructions from multiple threads to be interleaved for processing in parallel.

The performance implications can be remarkable…

Productivity Benchmarks – Workstation Performance

Let‘s quantify the performance upside by examining some leading productivity benchmarks. Tests like video editing, 3D rendering, code compiling and encryption highlight real-world workstation-class performance.

Video Rendering

In Puget Systems testing with Adobe Premiere Pro, the 3600‘s heightened throughput delivered a sizeable 40% faster export time across their extensive benchmark suite. Even better, the 3600 managed to stick to 65 watt power limits while drastically lowering render times. Demonstrating the efficiency upside of SMT scaling appropriately with increased workload.

3D Modeling

The popular Cinebench R20 benchmark leverages Cinema4D‘s 3D toolset to stress test processors at complex rendering tasks. Here the 3600 pulled ahead by 38% thanks to its beefier thread count.

Code Compilation

Measurements using the industry standard Blender open source toolkit saw the 3600 breeze through code compiling a whopping 49% quicker compared to the otherwise identical 3500X.

Encryption

Productivity tests benchmarking AES encryption algorithms again revealed a lead exceeding 35% for the 3600.

Across this range of strenuous real-world workloads, the 3600‘s SMT support drives 30-50% faster completion times – a massive margin that redefines workstation-class responsiveness and productivity.

Gaming FPS Benchmarks

Gaming represents another performance critical workload for mid-range power users. And here the 3600 continues to leverage its SMT capabilities (plus 100 MHz higher boost clocks) to deliver faster average FPS pushing the limits of high refresh rate monitors and even entry level VR headsets.

Let‘s examine some specific game tests:

Assassin’s Creed Odyssey

Battlefield V

Shadow of the Tomb Raider

Total War: Three Kingdoms

Do you notice the trend here? The Ryzen 5 3600‘s simultaneous multi-threading grants an additional 20-30% more logical processors to push frames through demanding game engines. This translates into 10-15% faster average FPS across top titles at 1080p resolution.

While both CPUs generally surpass the 60 FPS mark for smooth high action gameplay, the 3600‘s extra thread headroom allows maxing graphics options while retaining peak fluidity. This advantage widens further when live streaming through OBS/Twitch or utilizing background video recording with ReLive, GeForce Experience ShadowPlay or Windows Game Bar.

Price to Performance Comparison

We‘ve clearly demonstrated the 3600‘s commanding performance lead thanks to its game-changing SMT support. But what about cost? Surprisingly, both models debuted around $199 MSRP. However, retail pricing has dropped since launch with some intriguing trends:

  • Ryzen 5 3600$160
  • Ryzen 5 3500X$145

With only a $15 gap between the two CPUs, the value math heavily favors the 3600. You enjoy 30-50% faster working speeds across threaded productivity apps, 10-15% higher FPS in top games, plus future proofing for more demanding workloads – all for 7% more money.

In fact, using performance per dollar as a baseline, the 3600 delivers approximately 40% better value compared to the discounted 3500X. And with Intel‘s upcoming Raptor Lake expected to intensify competition, I anticipate further Ryzen price cuts which only improve 3600 scoring.

Unless found at a minimum $40+ discount or bundled with other PC components, the 3500X struggles to compete on value. Its minor savings simply does not justify such a drastic drop in real-world productivity and content creation performance that power users require.

Final Recommendation

The benchmarks and market pricing clearly demonstrate that the Ryzen 5 3600 stands far above its sibling 3500X in both overall performance and product value. By enabling multi-threading via SMT to support 12 threads, the 3600 breezes through heavy workstation-class workloads a whopping 30-50% faster while similarly accelerating modern gaming FPS by 10-15%.

Meanwhile, both CPUs are priced very competitively in today‘s market at just $15 dollars apart. This translates into over 40% better efficiency per dollar spent to purchase the 3600. And upcoming holiday sales could further improve cost scoring for the 3600.

Therefore, I wholeheartedly recommend picking the Ryzen 5 3600 as the best bang for buck option that still provides plenty of muscle for 1080p gaming, streaming and running intensive creative software workflows.

Unless found at an anomalous discount, the performance-limiting lack of SMT on the Ryzen 5 3500X makes it a poor value pick and difficult to recommend in good conscience!

I hope this detailed head-to-head analysis gives you confidence in selecting the right Ryzen 5 chip for building your next high powered desktop. Let me know if you have any other questions in the comments below!

Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Logo
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled