Hello There! 6 Reasons I Don‘t Recommend Buying Aura Frames Today

As your resident tech expert here, I‘ve dug deep into digital photo frames to save you some headaches. What I‘ve discovered is that while Aura frames boast nice displays and cloud integration, they suffer some fatal flaws. Compared to competitive options now on the market, Aura‘s offerings come up way short in key areas while costing you more money. Today I want to walk you through the specific reasons why I steer our savvy readers away from Aura frames for now.

Overreliance on WiFi Causes Headaches

Unlike most frames using some internal storage, Aura‘s cloud-only system means they require a constant WiFi connection to even perform basic functions. This creates a cascade of issues:

  • Any WiFi outage, even for a minute, halts your photo slideshow
  • Can‘t be used anywhere without an open WiFi signal – planes, hotels, your grandmother‘s house all now offlimits
  • Syncing and loading times get unbearably long over weaker connections
  • Forced cloud dependence locks owners into Aura‘s closed ecosystem

By contrast, competitors like Nixplay have built-in memory so you can easily load pictures directly from an SD card or USB drive without needing WiFi at all. This flexibility proves extremely useful. What good is a $200 frame that becomes a lifeless brick anytime your WiFi goes down?

Functionality Severely Lags Behind Competitors

For their premium price point, averaging $179, Aura frames offer surprisingly little in terms of usable features:

Adjustment Options

  • Display automatically adapts – no user controls
  • Odd proprietary 16:9 resolution
  • No color or brightness settings

Storage & Hardware

  • No onboard storage at all
  • Lackluster 128MB RAM
  • No SD card slot
  • Max 10 gb cloud storage

Other Features

  • No video or audio support
  • Extremely limited touch controls
  • No remote app option

By comparison, the Lenovo Smart Frame packs 8GB of built-in storage, customizable display output, Alexa support, and video playback at just $99. Aura‘s severe feature limitations simply don‘t justify doubling your budget.

Buggy App and Clunky Software

Since Aura frames fully rely on WiFi, you must use Aura‘s smartphone app for basic management like adding photos or arranging albums. Unfortunately, technical issues plague the platform:

CrashingApp freezes when uploading batches of photos
Painfully slow sync30+ minutes just to update playlists
Unintuitive interfaceBuried advanced settings, odd menus
Failing integrationsUnable to pull Facebook photos
Playback issuesFrame keeps resetting to default album

Reviewers report needing patience just to tolerate the app‘s quirks. Between connectivity gaps and software hiccups, Aura‘s poor execution rears its head frequently.

Pricier Than Competitors Without Reason

Currently selling around $179, Aura frames come at a premium cost, especially given their limitation compared to budget-friendly rival products:

Aura Mason$179NoneWiFi-only, no controls
Skylight Frame$1008GBTouch display, video
Nixplay Seed$1008GBApp access, wall mountable

With missing functionality and pared down hardware, what exactly are buyers paying extra money for with Aura? At face value, slick aesthetics appear prioritized over actual user experience.

Unreliable Customer Support Channels

When (not if) problems arise with Aura frames, owners find extremely limited support options:

  • Manuals – lack troubleshooting tips for WiFi or app issues
  • Email Support – very slow multi-day response times
  • Self-Help – FAQ fixes for basic setup only
  • No Phone or Chat – email-only customer service

Considering their flimsy internet dependency, my expectation would be rock-solid customer service infrastructure. Unfortunately, Aura fails dramatically on this front.

Privacy Protection Appears Lacking

To enable cross-device syncing, Aura makes you create accounts with emails, passwords, and usage data. However, transparency seems missing around how securely customer information gets handled:

  • Very vague privacy policy
  • No details on cloud encryption methods
  • App requests sweeping access to contacts, files
  • Unclear who can access stored photos

When your personal photos reside on someone else‘s servers, tight privacy controls become essential. Regrettably, Aura‘s opacity only fuels data security fears.

Better Digital Display Options Exist

Rather than wasting money on an unreliable Aura frame, there are better smart home display options in 2023 matching both quality and affordability:

Facebook Portal – Video chat capabilities plus digital photo frame for $99. Facial recognition to identify people.

Nixplay Seed – Leading frame specialty brand with app access, 8GB storage, and price under $100.

Lenovo Smart Frame – Alexa built-in with impressive 21.5" 4K display at just $399.

The verdict is clear – when it comes to purchase criteria like features, reliability, and customer support, Aura frames simply miss the mark compared to superior alternatives now on the market. I advise our savvy readers to look at other great options available that better suit your needs.

I appreciate you taking the time to follow my in-depth analysis here. My goal was to clearly showcase the multiple flaws holding back Aura frames in 2023. Hopefully these insights help you make the best choice if considering a digital photo frame for your household this year!

Yours tech-now,

Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled