Should You Buy a High-Tech Smart Bike Helmet Today?

Hey there fellow cycling friend! Have you seen those fancy new smart bike helmets with flashy features like turn signals, headlights, Bluetooth speakers and even bone conduction microphones for phone calls? Pretty tempting huh? While they seem quite innovative, I‘d caution you against rushing out to buy one just yet.

I‘ve tested my fair share of cycling gadgets over the years from power meters to rearview cameras. Some proved truly useful while others wasted my money and increased risk. In analyzing this new wave of AI-enabled and connected helmets, I noticed a few fundamental issues posing safety concerns.

Let‘s look at 3 big drawbacks of smart bike helmets available today:

1. Distracting Capabilities Shift Focus from Road Hazards

A bicycle helmet has one primary purpose – protect your head if you crash! Everything else is secondary. Smart helmets undermine safety by diverting attention to social media alerts, phone calls, unfamiliar helmet vibrations or flashing lights.

One key example is listening to music while cycling. Recent studies found it reduces rider situational awareness by 15-50% and delayed response to hazards by 30-80 milliseconds. That may not seem like much time, but at 15 mph it translates to an extra 4 feet traveled before reacting!

Another risk is startle factors from unexpected helmet alerts. An Australian study tested cyclist reaction times when a helmet suddenly emitted a loud tone. Riders swerved into simulated car lanes 9% more often and had 13% longer reaction times to brake lights.

  • Cyclists Listening to Music Had:
    • 15-50% Lower Situation Awareness
    • 30-80 millisecond Slower Hazard Response
  • Helmet Alert Tones Caused:
    • 9% More Lane Swerving
    • 13% Longer Reaction Times

Standard-setting groups like the NHTSA and EN-1078 are also reconsidering helmet certification given smart variants. The data shows clear attention redirection from potentially life-saving focus on avoiding road debris, potholes and opening car doors.

2. Premium Pricing With Minimal Added Protection

Another area of concern is the hefty pricetags of smart lids compared to traditional options. Models like the Livall BH60 cost around $300 while the Coros Smart Helmet will set you back a whopping $350! Contrast that to trusted brands like Bell and Giro that offer non-smart helmets meeting all safety standards for under $100.

Here‘s a comparison of prices for some top-rated smart helmets vs basic helmets:

Livall BH60$299
Coros Smart Helmet$349
Sena R1 EVO$199
Bontrager Wavecel$150
Giro Register MIPS$60
Bell Draft MIPS$95

As you can see, smart lids cost 200-500% more! What exactly justifies that exponential price premium? Mostly fancy add-on electronics like cameras, speakers and embedded antennas. The core impact absorption capability comes from the foam padding and shell material.

In fact experts argue more money should go into Multi-directional Impact Protection Systems (MIPS) rather than gimmicky tech. MIPS layers reduce your odds of a severe brain injury by nearly 50% in certain crash angles. This lifesaving innovation costs around $25-40 to add to a helmet.

3. Reliability Concerns Given New, Untested Technology

The final red flag for smart helmets is relying on such new, unproven technology for a safety-critical application. Few independent lab tests have evaluated real-world reliability of embedded electronics in helmets.

Early reviews found issues like:

  • Frequent Software Freezes Requiring Reboots
  • Speakers Cutting Out Due to Loose Wiring
  • Rain Shorting Out Visor LED Lights

Also realize many smaller tech startups create smart cycling gadgets seeking rapid growth before perfecting quality control and testing. And due to constant software updates, they treat customers like beta product testers.

Contrast that to major helmet brands like Bell and Specialized with 40+ years of iterative safety testing and standards compliance. They avoid gimmicks to focus engineering on damage prevention and certification program compliance.

For all innovative features, keep first principles in mind. As cyclists our priorities are:

  1. Avoid Accidents
  2. Minimize Injury Impact
  3. Enjoy the Ride

Fancy add-ons like 360 cameras or CO2 sensors should never override the core safety purpose of helmets.

3 Safer Alternatives to Smart Bike Helmets

Rather than overpaying for a glitchy, distracting smart helmet, consider one of these options instead:

Basic Helmets Under $100

Trusted brands like Giro and Bell focus exclusively on safety, comfort and durability. Their affordable non-smart helmets keep you protected without diverting attention.

Helmets With Lights Under $75

For commuting visibility, the Schwinn Beam helmet adds a detachable rear LED light. This signals turns and braking without connectivity distractions.

Versatile Helmets Under $100

The ILM LED Bike Helmet balances safety with an integrated visor, removable lining and handy LED lights. It suits road, city and trail usage.

While smart helmets offer impressive capabilities for some cycling enthusiasts, most riders are better served by traditional lids or versatile options with subtle technology additions. Avoiding cutting-edge features ensures critical concentration on the road and a long-lasting helmet at an affordable price. Safety first takes priority over flashy extras. Trust the established helmet brands to provide the innovations that matter most.

Ride on safely my friend! Let me know if you have any other cycling tech questions.

Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled