Nokia vs. Apple: Which Brand Is Your Best Option?

Nokia and Apple are two of the most iconic brands in the mobile technology industry. With origins tracing back over 100 years, both companies have rich histories filled with pinnacles of success as well as some spectacular failures. This article provides a detailed comparison of Nokia and Apple across various product categories to help you determine the best brand for your needs.

Brief Background

Nokia was founded in 1865 in Finland and started as a pulp mill operation before transitioning into rubber goods and then eventually telecommunications equipment and mobile devices (1). The company grew rapidly in the 1990s and 2000s to become the largest mobile phone manufacturer in the world, known for its simple yet durable phones. However, Nokia failed to adapt quickly enough to the rapid changes in the industry brought on by the iPhone and iOS ecosystem, leading to a steep decline in market share (2). The company has rebounded recently after being acquired by HMD Global and now focuses on budget-friendly Android smartphones.

In contrast, Apple was founded much later in 1976 by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak and Ronald Wayne (3). After early success with the Apple I and II personal computers, the company went through tough times in the 1990s. But it engineered a remarkable turnaround after Jobs returned and refocused the company‘s efforts on innovative premium products like the iMac and later the iPod, iPhone and iPad. Today, Apple is one of the world‘s most valuable brands known for its sleek, user-friendly devices and tightly integrated ecosystem of hardware, software and services.

Key Product Offerings

Both Nokia and Apple now focus primarily on mobile devices like smartphones and tablets, but have some differences in their product portfolio.

Nokia‘s current lineup consists mostly of budget and mid-range Android smartphones selling in the $100-$500 range (4). Most models run a stock version of Android instead of a heavily customized interface. Beyond phones, Nokia also offers a few rugged tablets and feature phones.

In contrast, Apple offers smartphones, tablets, smartwatches, desktop and notebook computers and related accessories and services. It is highly focused on the high-end market with premium devices like the iPhone, iPad and MacBook series (5). Most of Apple‘s revenue comes from its flagship iPhones which start around $700 and go up to $1,100+.

Operating Systems

A key area where Nokia and Apple devices differ is their operating system. All of Nokia‘s current phones and tablets run on some version of Google‘s Android OS, which is open-source and allows extensive customization by device makers (6). Android phones can also install apps from multiple app stores beyond Google‘s Play store.

In contrast, Apple uses its own proprietary iOS operating system across its entire range of mobile devices and computers. iOS only permits apps to be installed from Apple‘s own App Store and is designed to maximize security, stability and intuitive ease-of-use (7). However, iOS is also a "walled garden" that offers less flexibility and customization compared to Android.

As a result, Android phones like Nokia‘s have greater flexibility in configuring the interface and accessing non-standard apps and tools. But Apple‘s tight control over iOS allows it to provide a more seamless, streamlined experience across all devices.

Design & Build Quality

Both brands have distinct design philosophies for their devices. Nokia phones stand out for their durability – most feature sturdy polycarbonate shells that can withstand drops and general wear-and-tear better than typical all-glass phones (8). The removable back covers also provide easy access to the battery for replacement. Display sizes tend toward larger diagonals of 6 to 7 inches catering to video and multimedia consumption.

In contrast, Apple products feature premium aesthetics with anodized aluminum and glass exteriors polished to perfection. The iPhone is credited with kickstarting the trend of large-screen slim devices and Apple has steadily pushed the envelope with display advancements like OLED screens, HDR and 120Hz refresh rates across its lineup (9). However, the pursuit of elegance and slimmer form factors results in devices that are less rugged than Nokia‘s and suffer cracks/breaks more often. Repairs also tend to be costlier due to tight hardware integration.

Both brands offer some amount of water resistance in their high-end and even mid-range phones. But Nokia likely has the edge for everyday durability while Apple exceeds expectations on sophisticated style and visual appeal.


Imaging capabilities are vital for any modern smartphone. Nokia manages to integrate good quality cameras across all its phone tiers through partnerships with established players like Zeiss and Leica (10). Flagships like the Nokia 9 PureView sport cutting-edge tech like penta-lens systems for photography flexibility. Color reproduction tends to be very accurate but some models occasionally suffer in low light scenarios.

As the dominant premium brand, Apple expends tremendous R&D on iPhone photography and leads the mobile camera quality race year after year. Every new iPhone iteration ups the ante significantly with optics and image tuning improvements alongside better hardware capabilities like autofocus, OIS and powerful image processors (11). From portraits to panoramas and low light, iPhones are hard to beat for casual shooting. Only niche flagship Androids can compete.

For those focused on photography, Apple remains the gold standard in phone cameras but Nokia manages to punch above its weight with some clever innovations. Those on a tight budget would do well to check Nokia‘s models first.

Battery Life & Charging

Battery life has always been a strong suit for Nokia phones compared to the average Android device, let alone an iPhone (12). The brand‘s deep expertise in hardware design means their phones have larger than normal batteries alongside highly optimized software for longevity. Most Nokia phones easily last over a day of heavy usage and the biggest models can stretch nearly three days. Their mid-range lineup in particular shines for all-day endurance when competitors fall short. Charging tech also keeps up with support for fast charging standards.

Apple has made leaps in battery efficiency to make iPhones last longer but still don‘t quite measure up to top Android phones or Nokia. The compact form factor limits just how big the batteries can be. However, Apple makes up ground with their vastly more efficient mobile chipsets and refinements to memory management in iOS. The latest iPhones can last up to 1.5 days of active usage. The brand has also upped charging speeds considerably with 20W adapters able to hit 50% in 30 minutes (13).

If having the longest runtime without reaching for the charger is critical, Nokia devices are still your best bet. But Apple‘s battery optimizations prevent excessive anxiety even for moderate to heavy users.

Display Quality

Display panel specifications like size, resolution and refresh rate offer measurable metrics for comparison and Apple leads without question. The iPhone 14 Pro lineup sports industry-leading flexible OLED displays at up to 120Hz, 1500 nits peak brightness with HDR formats, nearly bezel-less designs and the highest pixel density for sharpness (14). Color accuracy is also unmatched.

Nokia relies primarily on LCD panels for cost savings but has recently adopted OLED for some high-end models like the 8.3 5G. Screen sizes run from 5.5 inches on compact phones and reach 6.8 inches for media phones. Mid-range and premium Nokias often support HDR video playback with adequate contrast and brightness levels for most scenarios (15). While a notch below Apple’s visual excellence, Nokia still delivers pleasing image quality representative of their pricing segments. Gamers and videophiles may be left wanting still.

Between the two, iPhones are in their own league for display superiority thanks to sustained R&D and leverage over the supply chain. But Nokia isn’t too far behind relative to comparable Android offerings.

Performance & Hardware

Processor performance, graphics capability and wireless modem technologies constitute some of the unseen foundations on which the smartphone experience rests. These components interact at a deep level and Apple owns an undisputed advantage by virtue of designing its own silicon and tight software-hardware integration.

The latest A16 mobile chip inside the iPhone 14 Pro benchmarks significantly faster than even flagship Android silicon from Qualcomm and Samsung (16). Gaming frame rates are higher, app launch speeds quicker and OS fluidity unmatched because Apple custom-tailors its hardware and software together. Support also extends for longer so iPhones receive updates for at least 5 years.

Nokia relies on Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets typically chosen to align with various pricing tiers. These provide adequate performance for most tasks but trail Apple at the highest tier. Memory and storage configurations also top out lower though remain appropriate for the cost bracket. The unified software platform across devices does help optimize stability somewhat.

For the best performance that stays fast even years down the road, Apple can’t be matched. But Nokia’s mid-range offerings punch above their specs sheet adequately for everyday users. Only intense gamers need to look elsewhere.


Mobile device security is paramount in an age rampant with malware, ransomware and privacy intrusions. As the largest vendor of premium smartphones globally, Apple dedicates tremendous resources to harden iOS defenses and sandbox critical services (17). Apps undergo thorough scrutiny before App Store admission and multiple layers of encryption safeguard locally stored data. Hardware-backed mechanisms like the Secure Enclave bolster protections further against sophisticated attacks. While no device is impregnable, Apple devices offer industry-leading security assurances out of the box making them enterprise favorites (18).

As an Android manufacturer, Nokia inherits both the strengths and weaknesses of Google’s platform security model. The open app ecosystem makes it easier for malicious apps to sneak in undetected and the fragmented operating system updates mean critical patches take longer to distribute versus iOS (19). However, Nokia does incorporate its own security hardening solutions atop baseline Android like an encrypted user interface, AI-based malware scanning and communications encryption. Device boot security is also a focus area (20). So Nokia smartphones aren’t defenseless but require more vigilance and awareness to stay protected compared to iPhones.

This round goes squarely to Apple but Nokia tries admirably to stem Android’s fundamental vulnerabilities. Cautious users may still prefer Apple’s walled fortress.

Customization & Openness

Android has always trumpeted increased customization compared to iOS and that holds true when comparing Nokia and Apple. Stemming from the underlying open-source foundations, Android allows significant UI skinning, supports icon packs and third-party launchers like Nova Launcher, and of course provides more avenues to install apps beyond the Play Store (21). Home screen widgets have long been a staple too. So Nokia phones can bend the software experience considerably more to user preference.

Conversely, iOS is intentionally designed to have a consistent and simplified interface across the system. Customization has been historically limited but has improved tremendously over the last couple major iOS versions (22). Apple now supports home screen widgets alongside basic theming options. But iOS still trails Android in overall personalization capabilities and extensive custom firmware development. Jailbreaking expands this flexibility but isn‘t officially condoned by Apple. So Android retains its edge among tweakers.


Pricing presents the starkest difference between both brands – Nokia plays squarely in the budget-friendly segment starting as low as $100 for basic smartphones and peaking around $700 (23). Most models hover in the very appealing $200 to $400 range ideal for cost-conscious buyers and developing markets. By minimizing costs on specs and components, Nokia delivers respectable features and quality for the low asking price.

Meanwhile Apple dominates the premium category with iPhones ranging from $700 all the way to $1600+. Specifications and components are cutting-edge across the lineup to support advanced iOS capabilities. Apple also invests heavily in after-sales support like Genius tech assistance and free OS updates. There‘s an undeniable price premium but Apple works hard to justify it via an elevated ownership experience (24). Still out of reach for many shoppers though.

Value-focused buyers can rejoice at Nokia’s offerings whereas Apple woos those seeking prestige and performance. There’s a fit for every budget between them.

Verdict: Which is Better?

So if pitting Nokia head-to-head against Apple, which brand builds the better phones and mobile devices? As explored above, both companies have respective strengths and wins across different areas.

  • Apple stands miles ahead on critical facets like displays, cameras, processing performance, premium design and robust ecosystem integration.
  • Nokia counterpunches on battery endurance, durability, customization flexibility and excellent value at every price point.

For many shoppers, especially in advanced economies, Apple likely holds greater appeal courtesy cutting-edge innovation and status symbol. iOS also impresses with strong security assurances and seamless connectivity with other Apple gear.

But Nokia devices serve essential buyer segments thanks to affordable pricing paired with quality and reliability that’s rare among similarly priced competitors. These practical advantages make Nokia a darling especially among developing markets like India where value reigns supreme.

Ultimately there’s merit selecting either brand depending on individual priorities – those wanting the best iOS apps, cameras and displays find Apple alluring whereas practical users eyeing basics done right lean towards Nokia. Both high-tech icons shine bright in their own ways even if the paths they pave diverge.



Did you like those interesting facts?

Click on smiley face to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

      Interesting Facts
      Login/Register access is temporary disabled