Let‘s clear the air first – the debate between "eBGP vs iBGP" is misleading because these protocols are not competing alternatives. Rather, they play complementary roles in enabling modern networks to route traffic seamlessly within and across organizational boundaries.
BGP or Border Gateway Protocol serves as the backbone for internet routing by maintaining routing tables that map out reachable networks. As a routing protocol, BGP helps routers along an end-to-end path identify the best next hop to forward traffic towards the destination.
BGP comes in two common flavors:
External BGP (eBGP) for routing between different autonomous systems (AS) like an enterprise network and an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network.
Internal BGP (iBGP) for routing within an autonomous system by distributing routes between routers under the same administration.
Now let‘s decode their key capabilities, use cases and mechanics in detail.
BGP Refresher: Protocol Mechanics
Before diving into eBGP and iBGP specifics, let‘s quickly recap how BGP works:
- BGP routers maintain a routing table based on routes advertised by neighbors
- It runs over TCP allowing reliable communication between peers
- BGP routers first form neighbor relationships through a simple handshake
- Once peered, routers send route updates advertising reachable networks
- BGP selects best routes based on attributes like AS-path, origin, metrics etc.
With this BGP foundation, let‘s map out how eBGP and iBGP build on these capabilities.
Key Differences at a Glance
Here is a technical comparison highlighting some key differences:
Attribute | eBGP | iBGP |
Peer Relationship | Forms between different ASBR routers | Within AS between internal routers |
Route Advertisement | Advertises routes received from one AS to another | Distributes routes internally within an AS |
Path Selection | Highest local preference, lowest AS path length | Hot Potato routing based on IGP cost |
Convergence Speed | Moderate convergence time | Very fast convergence through IGP |
Route Metrics | Manipulates attributes like AS-path, Next Hop | Carries original route attributes unchanged |
Let‘s analyze their capabilities more closely.
Where Does eBGP Fit In?
eBGP sets up peer relationships between border routers spanning different autonomous systems to enable inter-domain routing:
- Peer routers of different networks use eBGP to exchange route reachability information with each other
- For example, your corporate routers will have eBGP sessions with border routers of your ISP
- This allows seamless connectivity from your corporate sites to destinations on the public internet
- Route attributes may get manipulated when propagating routes across AS boundaries
Use cases:
- Connect private enterprise networks to public Internet
- Interconnect corporate sites with external business partners
- Exchange routes between Internet Service Providers
Hence, eBGP facilitates communication across different organizations by enabling route distribution between border routers of distinct networks.
How Does iBGP Work?
While eBGP routes traffic between AS‘s, iBGP optimizes routing inside an autonomous system by ensuring uniform routing information between all routers inside the AS:
- iBGP establishes an internal TCP session between route reflectors inside an AS
- Route reflectors avoid full iBGP mesh requirements by reflecting best routes learned to all routers
- This lets iBGP efficiently synchronize route reachability details within the AS
- Next-hop address and other attributes stay preserved across iBGP hops
Use cases:
- Distribute routes between core switches/routers within a large single enterprise
- Interconnect routers across multiple buildings/floors of a corporate campus site
By disseminating latest routes internally, iBGP enables consistent routing to avoid suboptimal packet forwarding.
Real-World Usage Scenarios
Let‘s consider two examples that demonstrate eBGP and iBGP routing policies in action:
Multi-Site Enterprise
ACME corporation has 3 office complexes in New York with over 1000 employees across two buildings in each site.
- Each building has access layer switches connecting end-user devices to distribution switches
- Core routers in every building connect through iBGP route reflection to share routing details
- eBGP sessions distribute routes between headquarters and secondary site routers
This allows office devices seamless LAN connectivity to enterprise servers hosted at the HQ. It also enables sites to access the Internet.
Hybrid Cloud Architecture
Nutanix is adopting a hybrid multi-cloud architecture spanning an existing on-premises datacenter and AWS infrastructure.
- The on-prem network runs iBGP for uniform routing between core routers and firewalls
- AWS Direct Connect and VPC peering set up eBGP connectivity between Nutanix‘s on-prem router and AWS transit gateway
- Routes exchanged via eBGP enable seamless traffic flow between Nutanix‘s on-prem servers to AWS hosted applications
So Nutanix utilizes iBGP internally and eBGP to stitch together their hybrid environment.
Best Practices for Implementation
Consider these tips while deploying either protocol:
For optimizing iBGP:
- Ensure redundancy of route reflectors to avoid single point of failure
- Set maximum hops to prevent iBGP routing loops
- Tune BGP and IGP timers for faster network convergence during changes
- Enable route dampening to minimize instability from flapping routes
For hardened eBGP deployments:
- Filter routes towards eBGP peers at AS perimeter to prevent incorrect routing information
- Utilize BGP authentication like MD5 hashes to authorize peer routers
- Modify eBGP multi-hop for scenarios without directly connected peers
- Reduce max prefix limits to guard against route table exhaustion
Properly monitoring peering state, route advertisements and topology changes lets you identify issues faster.
Closing Thoughts
The symbiotic partnership between eBGP and iBGP underpins reliable connectivity and efficient routing both within and between autonomous systems.
So rather than an "A vs B" face-off between opposing options, network engineers must leverage these protocols concurrently to architect high-performance routing infrastructure capable of supporting modern business needs.