Both tech giants Apple and Meta (formerly Facebook) have major ambitions in the emerging mixed reality space. Their latest flagship headsets – Apple Vision Pro and Meta Quest Pro – aim to push the boundaries of what‘s possible by combining VR and AR capabilities into singular mobile devices.
But how exactly do these two powerhouse MR headsets stack up? Which looks primed to deliver more advanced features and performance? I‘ll break things down across several key areas to give you the full picture.
Overview
We‘ll compare the Vision Pro and Quest Pro headsets across several axes:
- Design and ergonomics
- Hardware specs and processing capabilities
- Display resolution and optics technology
- Integrated software platforms and OS capabilities
- App ecosystem and developer support potential
- Current and future target use cases
- Raw performance and platform power
Combining insider knowledge from reports on Apple‘s secretive Labs with hands-on testing of the newly launched Quest Pro, we‘ll get a sense for how these flagship mixed reality (MR) headsets compare both today and in future potential.
Both Meta and Apple clearly have grand visions for reshaping computing through always-on glasses and lenses that seamlessly meld digital content with the physical. But Meta‘s iteration on existing VR form factors stands in contrast with hints of more radical innovations coming from Apple‘s labs.
Let‘s dig in on the details…
Design and Ergonomics
Comfort and wearability will make or break wide adoption of any headworn device meant for continuous daily use well into the future. On that crucial count, early Meta Quest Pro reviews indicate there‘s still room to improve.
The slick matte black visor with retractable feet is 40% slimmer than the Quest 2, but ergonomics issues linger:
Metric | Meta Quest Pro | Apple Vision Pro |
---|---|---|
Weight | 713g | Reportedly 300-400g target |
Form factor | Rigid plastic arms with single top strap | Unknown |
Usage comfort | Can cause pressure points during extended sessions | "Focus on distributing weight effectively" per reports |
With a lighter weight target nearing half of the Quest Pro, Apple has set its sights on all-day wearable comfort. This aligns closely with their focus on ergonomics in products like the Watch. Design patents also show clever use of fabrics in anchoring and weight distribution.
Early reveals indicate a slick, rounded aesthetic for their Vision Pro headset. Expect Apple‘s renowned design language to permeate their first major new hardware category since Apple Watch, blending form and function.
Hardware and Processing Power
Both headsets promise significant leaps over their predecessors processing and performance-wise. But Apple‘s custom silicon expertise gives it yet another edge.
Let‘s compare their next-gen specs:
Meta Quest Pro | Apple Vision Pro | |
---|---|---|
Chip | Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2+ | Apple M2 |
CPU perf | 50% > Quest 2 | 18% > M1 per watt |
GPU perf | 50% > Quest 2 | 35% > M1 |
RAM | 12GB LPDDR5 | 16GB (?) |
Storage | 256GB | Unknown |
The Snapdragon XR2+ no doubt improves significantly upon the XR2 powering Meta‘s popular Quest 2. But early benchmarks of Apple‘s M2 chip give us insight into the processing prowess they‘re bringing to bear.
Note the double-digit percentage performance per watt improvements across CPU, GPU and AI workloads. As Meta technical fellow John Carmack noted, the Quest 2 pushed mobile VR platforms to their limit. Apple‘s silicon unlocks order-of-magnitude performance increases Meta can‘t match short of new custom hardware.
Display, Resolution and Optics
Optical technologies constitute another vital area that impacts visual fidelity and realism. Both players are adopting next-gen approaches like local dimming and vari-focal displays:
Visual Capabilities | Meta Quest Pro | Apple Vision Pro |
---|---|---|
Resolution | 1800 x 1920px per eye | Expected 4000 x 4000px |
Display | OLED w/ local dimming | MicroOLED/microLED rumored |
Refresh rate | 40-90Hz variable | Unknown – ProMotion? |
FOV | Unknown | Expansive per reports |
Special optics | Pancake lenses | Laser beam scanning |
The Quest Pro nearly matches top-end PC VR resolution today around 3.5K by 3.5K total. But rumors place Apple‘s relentless pursuit of Retina-level pixel density near a staggering 8K by 8K total!
Both companies are clearly pushing the bleeding edge on resolution, advanced local dimming/contrast, and refresh rates for next-level optics. Expect life-like visuals that bridge 80%+ towards "retinal resolution" based on neuroscience, triggering new depths of presence.
But specialized optics matter hugely too. Pancake lenses help collapse form factor, while laser beam scanning aims for optimized focal range. We‘ll have to stay tuned on the final release specs here.
Software, OS and App Support
Any computing platform relies heavily on its supporting software ecosystem. Does Meta‘s maturity balance out risks in forking core infrastructure like Android?
Meta Quest Pro | Apple Vision Pro | |
---|---|---|
OS | Android Fork "Horizon OS" | RealityOS – proprietary |
App ecosystem | Oculus Store | Apple App Store |
Dev tools | Unity, Unreal | Xcode Cloud, Reality Composer etc |
Distribution reach | 100M+ MAUs across devices | 800M+ iPhone/iPad users |
Meta‘s existing Oculus userbase tops 100 million, and they‘ve made investments into developer-centric tools for pushing the envelope further.
However, Apple retains immense control over end-to-end user experiences with RealityOS. Tight integration with iPhone, iPad, and Mac OS unmatched in the market could become their "killer app" enhancing headset capabilities further still.
Distribution through the App Store tap into an order of magnitude more global users. And Apple‘s user privacy focus contrasts starkly with Meta‘s checkered reputation in the space.
The sheer reach of over 800 million monetizable App Store customers could entice developers big and small to RealityOS in droves. Paired with Apple‘s suite of dev tools and resources, their supporting ecosystem shows immense potential.
Use Cases and Potential
Both Apple and Meta eventually aim to bring mixed reality tech to the mainstream through sleek, stylish form factors. But their target users differ initially:
Meta Quest Pro focuses squarely on enterprise/prosumer productivity use cases while retaining the entertainment scope of prior Oculus devices:
- Remote collaboration apps like Horizon Workrooms
- Training simulations for retail, healthcare etc.
- 3D visualization across design, engineering use cases
- Location-based VR entertainment venues
- Social connection apps
Apple Vision Pro fits a familiar strategy – target creative pros and developers first to catalyze an ecosystem:
- Apple has reportedly demoed VR call and meeting software internally
- CAD/CAM and 3D design tool integration planned
- Location-anchored mixed reality content creation
- Next-gen app prototyping to fuel developer creativity
- High-end gaming capabilities
Both Oculus and Apple have proven able to span from gaming to critical enterprise use cases. But rumors suggest Apple‘s initial focus on creators and commercial applications could pave the way for explosive growth across sectors long-term.
Bottom Line Performance and Power
Given Apple‘s custom silicon expertise and control over end-to-end hardware + software, their Vision Pro headset looks likely to surpass Meta‘s Quest Pro mightily in raw capabilities:
Metric | Meta Quest Pro | Apple Vision Pro |
---|---|---|
Overall Performance | Cutting edge mobile hardware stretched to limits | Custom M-series chip breakthrough performance |
Visual Fidelity | Excellent given mobile platform constraints | Rumored specs could set new industry benchmarks |
Hardware/software integration | Solid but Android is fragmented base | RealityOS purpose-built experience from ground up |
Ecosystem Potential | Large mainstream consumer Oculus userbase | 800M+ App Store accounts and unmatched dev tools |
Both sets no doubt represent pinnacle achievements pushing the mobile category forward. But Apple‘s silicon leadership and control over the full technology stack poises Vision Pro to attain new heights for the industry. Paired with the App Store juggernaut and Apple‘s focus on reshaping computing long-term, their headset could achieve new levels immersion and user delight.
If I had to bet on which device emerges the clear pinnacle of technical achievement upon release – it would be Apple Vision Pro in a walk based on all current indicators. We‘ll know for sure when their secret labs‘ work sees the light of day expected next year. Either way, with Apple and Meta advancing the state of the art aggressively, the future looks incredibly bright for mixed reality experiences many couldn‘t even dream of just years ago.
Exciting times lay ahead! We‘ll continue tracking both headsets‘ journey closely with hands-on analysis as they come to life for consumers and enterprises alike.